Anaesthetic efficacy of 2 lidocaine with different concentrations of epinephrine (1:80,000 and 1:200,000) in intraligamentary injection after a failed primary inferior alveolar nerve block: a randomized double-blind study

(2020) Anaesthetic efficacy of 2 lidocaine with different concentrations of epinephrine (1:80,000 and 1:200,000) in intraligamentary injection after a failed primary inferior alveolar nerve block: a randomized double-blind study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. pp. 275-280. ISSN 0001-6357

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: WOS:000501693300001

Abstract

Introduction: The present study evaluated the anaesthetic efficacy of 2 lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine vs. 2 lidocaine with 1:200,000 given as supplemental intraligamentary injections after a failed inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. The effect of these solutions on the heart rate was also evaluated. Methods: One-hundred-eighteen adult patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpits in a mandibular first or second molar, received an initial IANB with 2 lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine. Pain during the endodontic treatment was assessed using a visual analogue scale (Heft-Parker VAS). Eighty-eight patients with unsuccessful anaesthesia were randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups: one group received 0.6 mL/root of supplementary intraligamentary injection of 2 lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine; while the second group received 2 lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine. Endodontic treatment was re-initiated. Success after primary injection or supplementary injection was defined as no or mild pain (pain score <= 54 mm on HP VAS) during access preparation and root canal instrumentation. Heart rate was monitored using a finger pulse oximeter. The anaesthetic success rates were analyzed with the Pearson chi-square test at 5 significance levels. The heart rate changes were analyzed using the t-test. Results: The anaesthetic success rate in patients receiving supplementary intraligamentary injections in 1:80,000 epinephrine group was 82, while the intraligamentary injections with 2 lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine were successful in 57 of cases. The difference was statistically significant (chi(2)=6.4, p = .011). There was no significant effect of both the anaesthetic agents on the mean heart rate. Conclusions: Both 2 lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine and 2 lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine improved the success rates after a failed primary anaesthetic injection. The 1:80,000 epinephrine group was significantly more successful.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Inferior alveolar nerve block lidocaine intraligamentary injection irreversible pulpitis mandibular molars periodontal-ligament injection irreversible pulpitis mandibular molars articaine vasoconstrictors infiltration Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Subjects: WO Surgery > WO 200-460 Anesthesia
Divisions: Faculty of Dental > Department of Endodontics
Page Range: pp. 275-280
Journal or Publication Title: Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
Journal Index: ISI
Volume: 78
Number: 4
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2019.1700302
ISSN: 0001-6357
Depositing User: Zahra Otroj
URI: http://eprints.mui.ac.ir/id/eprint/10868

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item