(2021) Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review. Obesity Surgery. pp. 2453-2463. ISSN 0960-8923
|
Text
14619.pdf Download (419kB) |
Abstract
Purpose One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is now an established bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure with good outcomes. Despite two recent consensus statements around OAGB/MGB, there are some issues which are not accepted as consensus and need more long-term data and research. Material and Methods After identifying the topic of non-consensus from the two recent OAGB/MGB consensuses, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched for articles published by November 2020. Results In this study, we evaluated these non-consensus topics around OAGB/MGB and all related articles on these topics were assessed by authors to have an argument on these items. Conclusion There is enough evidence to include OAGB/MGB as an accepted standard bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure. However, long-term data and more research are needed to have a consensus in all aspects including these non-consensus topics.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | One anastomosis gastric bypass Mini gastric bypass Bariatric surgery Consensus TERM-FOLLOW-UP WEIGHT-LOSS SINGLE-ANASTOMOSIS SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY BARIATRIC SURGERY MORBID-OBESITY BILIOPANCREATIC LIMB EXPERIENCE OUTCOMES COMPLICATIONS |
| Subjects: | WI Digestive System > WI 980 Digestive System Surgical Procedures |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Medicine > Departments of Clinical Sciences > Department of Surgery |
| Page Range: | pp. 2453-2463 |
| Journal or Publication Title: | Obesity Surgery |
| Journal Index: | ISI |
| Volume: | 31 |
| Number: | 6 |
| Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05276-2 |
| ISSN: | 0960-8923 |
| Depositing User: | Zahra Otroj |
| URI: | http://eprints.mui.ac.ir/id/eprint/14619 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |


