Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review

(2021) Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review. Obesity Surgery. pp. 2453-2463. ISSN 0960-8923

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Purpose One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is now an established bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure with good outcomes. Despite two recent consensus statements around OAGB/MGB, there are some issues which are not accepted as consensus and need more long-term data and research. Material and Methods After identifying the topic of non-consensus from the two recent OAGB/MGB consensuses, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched for articles published by November 2020. Results In this study, we evaluated these non-consensus topics around OAGB/MGB and all related articles on these topics were assessed by authors to have an argument on these items. Conclusion There is enough evidence to include OAGB/MGB as an accepted standard bariatric and metabolic surgical procedure. However, long-term data and more research are needed to have a consensus in all aspects including these non-consensus topics.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: One anastomosis gastric bypass Mini gastric bypass Bariatric surgery Consensus TERM-FOLLOW-UP WEIGHT-LOSS SINGLE-ANASTOMOSIS SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY BARIATRIC SURGERY MORBID-OBESITY BILIOPANCREATIC LIMB EXPERIENCE OUTCOMES COMPLICATIONS
Page Range: pp. 2453-2463
Journal or Publication Title: Obesity Surgery
Journal Index: ISI
Volume: 31
Number: 6
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05276-2
ISSN: 0960-8923
Depositing User: Zahra Otroj
URI: http://eprints.mui.ac.ir/id/eprint/14619

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item