Evaluation of Clonidine Augmentation Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment; a Randomized Clinical Trial

(2021) Evaluation of Clonidine Augmentation Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment; a Randomized Clinical Trial. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES. ISSN 1735-8639 1735-9287 J9 - IRAN J PSYCHIATRY BE

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common neuropsychiatric disorder worldwide. Inadequate response of OCD patients to a usual agent makes this disorder a great challenge, and recent studies have recommended augmentation therapy as a new choice. Objectives: As traces of noradrenergic dysfunction have been noted in OCD pathophysiology, the current study aimed to assess the efficacy of clonidine augmentation therapy for treating OCD. Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial conducted on 57 OCD patients divided into the two groups of 1-mg clonidine augmentation therapy (n = 28) and placebo group (n = 29). The medication was administered for 12 weeks. Patients' primary treatment, including SSRIs or clomipramine, continued by receiving the same dose used before participation in this study. The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (CGI-S) were used to assess the patients at the start of the study and then at four-week intervals. Drug-related adverse effects and global improvement were assessed and compared between the two groups. Results: Theinitial CGI scores were 3.89 +/- 1.57 and 4.10 +/- 1.61 at the baseline and 2.29 +/- 1.18 and 3.07 +/- 1.51 at theendof the study in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Both groups revealed a significant improvement (P-value = 0.001) with no significant difference between them (P-value = 0.22). The primary Y-BOCS score in the clonidine-treated group was 27.61 +/- 8.08 versus 28.69 +/- 7.44 in the control group at the baseline, which declined to 20.25 +/- 6.08 versus 25.45 +/- 7.35 at the end of the study, respectively. Both groups revealed a significant improvement (P-value = 0.001), but there was no statistically significant difference between them (P-value = 0.06). Drug-related complications were not statistically different between the two groups (P-value > 0.05); however, the clonidine-treated patients presented more adverse effects than control subjects. Conclusions: Although the use of clonidine posed no remarkable drug-related adverse effects, it was not superior to placebo considering symptom relief.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Clomipramine Clonidine Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor STRATEGIES REDUCTION GLUTAMATE BRAIN
Journal or Publication Title: IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Journal Index: ISI
Volume: 15
Number: 3
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.112131
ISSN: 1735-8639 1735-9287 J9 - IRAN J PSYCHIATRY BE
Depositing User: Zahra Otroj
URI: http://eprints.mui.ac.ir/id/eprint/17063

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item