(2016) Mammographic density assessed on paired raw and processed digital images and on paired screen-film and digital images across three mammography systems. Breast Cancer Research. ISSN 1465-542X
Full text not available from this repository.
Abstract
Background: Inter-women and intra-women comparisons of mammographic density (MD) are needed in research, clinical and screening applications; however, MD measurements are influenced by mammography modality (screen film/digital) and digital image format (raw/processed). We aimed to examine differences in MD assessed on these image types. Methods: We obtained 1294 pairs of images saved in both raw and processed formats from Hologic and General Electric (GE) direct digital systems and a Fuji computed radiography (CR) system, and 128 screen-film and processed CR-digital pairs from consecutive screening rounds. Four readers performed Cumulus-based MD measurements (n = 3441), with each image pair read by the same reader. Multi-level models of square-root percent MD were fitted, with a random intercept for woman, to estimate processed-raw MD differences. Results: Breast area did not differ in processed images compared with that in raw images, but the percent MD was higher, due to a larger dense area (median 28.5 and 25.4 cm(2) respectively, mean root dense area difference 0.44 cm (95 CI: 0.36, 0.52)). This difference in root dense area was significant for direct digital systems (Hologic 0.50 cm (95 CI: 0.39, 0.61), GE 0.56 cm (95 CI: 0.42, 0.69)) but not for Fuji CR (0.06 cm (95 CI: -0.10, 0.23)). Additionally, within each system, reader-specific differences varied in magnitude and direction (p < 0.001). Conversion equations revealed differences converged to zero with increasing dense area. MD differences between screen-film and processed digital on the subsequent screening round were consistent with expected time-related MD declines. Conclusions: MD was slightly higher when measured on processed than on raw direct digital mammograms. Comparisons of MD on these image formats should ideally control for this non-constant and reader-specific difference.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | breast density image processing mammographic density assessment breast cancer methods breast-cancer risk program |
Journal or Publication Title: | Breast Cancer Research |
Journal Index: | ISI |
Volume: | 18 |
Identification Number: | Artn 130 10.1186/S13058-016-0787-0 |
ISSN: | 1465-542X |
Depositing User: | مهندس مهدی شریفی |
URI: | http://eprints.mui.ac.ir/id/eprint/2212 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |