Effect of Cooling of Lidocaine with Epinephrine on the Anesthetic Success of Supplementary Intraligamentary Injection after a Failed Primary Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial

(2023) Effect of Cooling of Lidocaine with Epinephrine on the Anesthetic Success of Supplementary Intraligamentary Injection after a Failed Primary Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial. European Endodontic Journal. pp. 239-245. ISSN 2548-0839

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this prospective, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of cooling a 2 lidocaine solution with 1:200,000 epinephrine, administered as a supplementary intraligamentary injection to overcome a failed primary inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB).Methods: The study was preceded by a pilot study to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of plain lidocaine solutions given as intraligamentary injections. In the subsequent randomized clinical trial, one hundred and thirty-eight patients received IANB with 2 lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine for endodontic management of a mandibular molar with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Eighty-eight patients reported pain greater than 54 mm on a visual analog scale (Heft-Parker VAS) were categorized as unsuccessful anesthesia. These patients received either of the following intraligamentary injections: 2 lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine at room temperature; or 2 lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine at 4 & DEG;C. Anesthetic success was again evaluated after re-initiation of the endodontic treatment. The heart rates of the patients were measured using a finger pulse oximeter. The categorical success rates were statistically analyzed with the Pearson chi-square test at 5 significance levels. The heart rate measurements were analyzed using a t-test. Results: The intraligamentary injections with anesthetic solutions at room temperature presented a success rate of 59.1, while the injections with a solution at 4 & DEG;C gave a success rate of 52.27. There were no significant differences between the success rates of the groups (& chi;2=0.41, p=0.52). Regarding the heart rates, there were no differences between the two solutions at baseline (T=1.2, p=0.2) or after injectionsConclusion: Reducing the temperature of 2 lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine to 4 & DEG;C does not affect the anesthetic efficacy of supplemental intraligamentary injections, given after a failed primary IANB.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: (T=0 64 p=0 52) Cooling epinephrine irreversible pulpitis lidocaine mandibular anesthesia periodontal-ligament injection intraosseous injection irreversible pulpitis local-anesthetics efficacy articaine vasoconstrictors duration failure Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Page Range: pp. 239-245
Journal or Publication Title: European Endodontic Journal
Journal Index: ISI
Volume: 8
Number: 4
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.41275
ISSN: 2548-0839
Depositing User: خانم ناهید ضیائی
URI: http://eprints.mui.ac.ir/id/eprint/25845

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item