Are ROMA and HE4 more accurate than CA-125, in predicting of ovarian epithelial carcinoma?

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of ovarian tumors based on tumor markers could have high clinical importance. In this study, we aimed to assess the predictive value of HE4 and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) compared to CA-125 in the Malignancy of ovarian epithelial masses. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed in 2020-2021 including 203 patients. Serum HE4 and CA-125 levels were checked before surgery. According to the pathology report (benign, borderline, or malignant epithelial mass), the predictive values of the three markers were evaluated. Results: About 146 cases were benign; 14 cases were borderline and 43 cases were malignant. Most patients (69.8) in the malignant group were in stage 3. Significantly higher levels of all three markers (CA-125, HE4, and ROMA) were found in patients with malignant tumors compared to benign or borderline tumors (P < 0.001 for all). The sensitivity of CA-125 was the highest (90.7) in pre- and post-menopausal patients but the specificity of HE4 and ROMA were higher than CA-125 (98.1 and 97.5, respectively, versus 86.9 for CA-125). In post-menopausal patients, both sensitivities of HE4 and ROMA were 90.5 and the specificity and sensitivity of CA-125 were the highest (95.2 and 100). In premenopausal patients, the sensitivity of ROMA (90.9) and the specificity of HE4 (100) were the highest. Conclusions: HE4 and ROMA are not necessary for postmenopausal patients in low-resource areas and a check of serum CA-125 will be enough. The higher-cost, ROMA, and HE4 checks are recommended in premenopausal people because they are more sensitive.