Effect of shape and design of the internal connection of tissue-level and bone-level implants on detorque values and removal forces: An in vitro study

Abstract

Statement of problem. Optimal implant stability and preventing complications such as screw loosening are paramount concerns for implant-supported prostheses. However, studies examining the influence of various internal connection designs on detorque values and removal forces, critical aspects of implant success, are lacking. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the impact of the shape and design of the internal connection in tissue-level and bone-level implants on the detorque value and the force required for abutment removal from the implant. Material and methods. Forty dental implants were securely mounted in 10x6x20-mm acrylic resin blocks positioned perpendicular to the surface. The implants were divided into 4 groups (n=10): bone-level SM Torx, tissue-level PSI Torx, bone-level UF Hex, and tissue-level UF Hex implants. After exposure to a dynamic loading test at 31.2 N, 2 Hz and 10(6) cycles, measurements were made of both detorque values and removal forces. Statistical analyses, including 1-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, were conducted to assess the results (alpha=.05). Results. The differences in detorque values among the 4 groups were statistically similar (P=.087). In terms of removal force values, tissue-level PSI implants exhibited the highest values, while bone-level UF implants had the lowest values, with significant differences in the removal forces among the 4 groups (P<.001). Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences among the groups (P<.001), except for the comparison between tissue-level PSI and bone-level SM implants (P=.108). Conclusions. While detorque values remain consistent across implant types, the shape and design of the internal connection of implants has a significant impact on the removal force required for abutment detachment from the implant. (J Prosthet Dent 2024;131:1135.e1-e5)