Comparison of Two Scoring Systems, QSOFA and ASAPS, in Predicting the Mortality Rate of Multiple Trauma Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit in Isfahan Medical Sciences Hospitals

(2026) Comparison of Two Scoring Systems, QSOFA and ASAPS, in Predicting the Mortality Rate of Multiple Trauma Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit in Isfahan Medical Sciences Hospitals. Journal of Isfahan Medical School. pp. 486-491. ISSN 10277595 (ISSN)

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background: Many patients who come to the hospital due to multiple traumas need to be hospitalized in the intensive care unit. While they remain waiting for reasons such as lack of access to intensive care beds. Due to limited resources and increased costs, it is important to estimate the prognosis of patients in the priority of receiving services, and predictive scoring systems are useful in this field. In this regard, the study was conducted with the aim of comparing two scoring systems, QSOFA and ASAPS, in predicting the mortality rate of hospitalized multiple trauma patients. Methods: A descriptive study was conducted on 115 multiple trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit in Isfahan Medical Sciences Hospitals in 2018-2019. Data collection was done using a questionnaire, demographic information of the patients including age, sex, weight, history of diseases and other necessary information of the patient was collected. To evaluate the condition of patients in ICU, two scoring systems, QSOFA and ASAPS, were used. In the descriptive part, the percentage (number) and mean (standard deviation) and in the analytical part, logistic regression modeling was used by removing the effect of possible confounders on the incidence of mortality. Findings: The results showed that the ASAPS scoring method has the necessary efficiency and validity to predict the mortality rate of patients hospitalized in the ICU with multiple traumas. Also, the QSOFA method was very accurate in predicting the death rate of patients. Conclusion: The quick and simple QSOFA method and the efficient ASAPS method each have their own advantages and limitations. The efficiency of scoring and predictive methods is improved by optimizing their parameters, and this has led to the updating of these scoring systems. © 2026, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences(IUMS). All rights reserved.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Mortality Multiple trauma Scoring System Special Care American Society of Anaesthesiologists score Article comparative study demographics human intensive care unit major clinical study mortality rate prediction questionnaire quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score
Page Range: pp. 486-491
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Journal Index: Scopus
Volume: 44
Number: 857
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.48305/jims.v44.i857.0486
ISSN: 10277595 (ISSN)
Depositing User: خانم ناهید ضیائی
URI: http://eprints.mui.ac.ir/id/eprint/35010

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item