In vitro versus in vivo models of kidney fibrosis: Time-course experimental design is crucial to avoid misinterpretations of gene expression data

Abstract

Background: In vitro models are common tools in nephrology research. However, their validity has rarely been scrutinized. Materials and Methods: Considering the critical role of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta and hypoxia pathways in kidney fibrosis, kidney-derived cells were exposed to TGF-beta and/or hypoxic conditions and the expression levels of some genes related to these two signaling pathways were quantified in a time-course manner. Furthermore, a unilateral ureteral obstruction mouse model was generated, and the expressions of the same genes were assessed. Results: In all in vitro experimental groups, the expression of the genes was noisy with no consistent pattern. However, in the animal model, TGF-beta pathway-related genes demonstrated considerable overexpression in the ureteral obstruction group compared with the sham controls. Interestingly, hypoxia pathway genes had prominent fluctuations with very similar patterns in both animal groups, suggesting a periodical pattern not affected by the intervention. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that in vitro findings should be interpreted cautiously and if possible are substituted or supported by animal models that are more consistent and reliable. Furthermore, we underscore the importance of time-course evaluation of both case and control groups in gene expression studies to avoid misconceptions caused by gene expression noise or intrinsic rhythms.