Cardiac rehabilitation costs

Abstract

Background: Despite the clinical benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and its cost-effectiveness, it is not widely received. Arguably, capacity could be greatly increased if lower-cost models were implemented. The aims of this review were to describe: the costs associated with CR delivery, approaches to reduce these costs, and associated implications. Methods: Upon finalizing the PICO statement, information scientists were enlisted to develop the search strategy of MEDLINE, Embase, CDSR, Google Scholar and Scopus. Citations identified were considered for inclusion by the first author. Extracted cost data were summarized in tabular format and qualitatively synthesized. Results: There is wide variability in the cost of CR delivery around the world, and patients pay out-of-pocket for some or all of services in 55 of countries. Supervised CR costs in high-income countries ranged from PPP294 (Purchasing Power Parity; 2016 United States Dollars) in the United Kingdom to PPP12,409 in Italy, and in middle-income countries ranged from PPP146 in Venezuela to PPP1095 in Brazil. Costs relate to facilities, personnel, and session dose. Delivering CR using information and communication technology (mean cost PPP753/patient/program), lowering the dose and using lower-cost personnel and equipment are important strategies to consider in containing costs, however few explicitly low-cost models are available in the literature. Conclusion: More research is needed regarding the costs to deliver CR in community settings, the cost-effectiveness of CR in most countries, and the economic impact of return-to-work with CR participation. A low-cost model of CR should be standardized and tested for efficacy across multiple healthcare systems. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.