Posterolateral instrumented fusion with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: A randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up

(2016) Posterolateral instrumented fusion with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: A randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. pp. 43-49. ISSN 0974-8237

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background: Spondylolisthesis is a common cause of surgery in patients with lower back pain. Although posterolateral fusion and pedicle screw fixation are a relatively common treatment method for the treatment of spondylolisthesis, controversy exists about the necessity of adding interbody fusion to posterolateral fusion. The aim of our study was to assess the functional disability, pain, and complications in patients with spondylolisthesis treated by posterolateral instrumented fusion (PLF) with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in a randomized clinical trial. Materials and Methods: From February 2007 to February 2011, 50 adult patients with spondylolisthesis were randomly assigned to be treated with PLF or PLFTLIF techniques (25 patients in each group) by a single surgeon. Back pain, leg pain, and disability were assessed before treatment and until 2 years after surgical treatment using visual analog scale (VAS) and oswestry disability index (ODI). Patients were also evaluated for postoperative complications such as infection, neurological complications, and instrument failure. Results: All patients completed the 24 months of follow-up. Twenty patients were females and 30 were males. Average age of the patients was 53 11 years for the PLF group and 51 13 for the PLF TLIF group. Back pain, leg pain, and disability score were significantly improved postoperatively compared to preoperative scores (P < 0.001). At 3 months of follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in VAS score for back pain and leg pain in both groups; however, after 6 months and 1 year and 2 years follow-up, the reported scores for back pain and leg pain were significantly lower in the PLFTLIF group (P < 0.05). The ODI score was also significantly lower in the PLFTLIF group at 1 year and 2 years of follow-up (P < 0.05). One screw breakage and one superficial infection occurred in the PLFTLIF group, which had no statistical significance (P = 0.373). Conclusion: It seems that accompanying TLIF with PLF might lead to better functional improvement and pain reduction in patients with spondylolisthesis.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: posterolateral instrumented fusion (plf) spine spondylolisthesis transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (tlif) pedicle screw instrumentation spondylolytic spondylolisthesis spinal-fusion posterior fixation decompression fractures level
Page Range: pp. 43-49
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Journal Index: ISI
Volume: 7
Number: 1
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.176623
ISSN: 0974-8237
Depositing User: مهندس مهدی شریفی
URI: http://eprints.mui.ac.ir/id/eprint/3145

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item