Identifying Key Components in Evaluating Science and Technology Policies in the Medical Field Using the Delphi Method

(2026) Identifying Key Components in Evaluating Science and Technology Policies in the Medical Field Using the Delphi Method. Journal of Isfahan Medical School. pp. 1793-1800. ISSN 10277595 (ISSN)

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background: Evaluating science, technology, and innovation (STI) policies in specialized fields such as dentistry requires the use of accurate, specialized, and expert-based indicators. However, many of the common indicators are general and do not take into account the characteristics of the dentistry field. This study aimed to identify and validate key indicators for evaluating STI policies in the dentistry field. Methods: This study was conducted with a mixed (qualitative-quantitative) approach and in a multi-stage manner. In the first stage, using the meta-combination method, 198 scientific studies related to STI evaluation indicators were extracted from reputable scientific databases and subjected to thematic analysis. In the second stage, the Delphi method was used to validate and prioritize the indicators with the participation of 52 experts specializing in the fields of science and technology policymaking, dental research management, and science assessment. Finally, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in AMOS software was used to confirm the factor structure of the final indicators. Findings: The Delphi process led to the identification of 10 key indicators in four categories: Scientific (dental h-index and g-index), technological (number of advanced devices, investment in research), innovative (number of knowledge-based enterprises, innovation efficiency index), and structural-evaluation (existence of an integrated database, National Dental Center). The Kendall coordination coefficient was 0.71 in the final round, indicating good agreement between experts. Confirmatory factor analysis also confirmed the appropriate fit of the proposed model. Conclusion: This study provided an integrated, evidence-based framework and expert consensus for evaluating science, technology, and innovation policies in the field of dentistry. The use of these specialized indicators can help improve the transparency, accountability, and effectiveness of research and technological policies in this area. © 2026, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences(IUMS). All rights reserved.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Delphi Method Dentistry Innovation Indicators Science and Technology Policy Evaluation article confirmatory factor analysis consensus data base Delphi study dental research evidence based practice human investment participation software thematic analysis
Page Range: pp. 1793-1800
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Journal Index: Scopus
Volume: 43
Number: 844
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.48305/jims.v43.i844.1793
ISSN: 10277595 (ISSN)
Depositing User: خانم ناهید ضیائی
URI: http://eprints.mui.ac.ir/id/eprint/35066

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item