Comparison of 1-stage versus 2-stage decompression, fusion and instrumentation surgery in patients with coexisting cervical and lumbar degenerative spondylotic disorders; a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial study

(2016) Comparison of 1-stage versus 2-stage decompression, fusion and instrumentation surgery in patients with coexisting cervical and lumbar degenerative spondylotic disorders; a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial study. Journal of Isfahan Medical School. ISSN 10277595 (ISSN)

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background: Coexistent involvement of cervical and lumbar spine with destructive spondylotic degenerative processes such as tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) can be managed with simultaneous or staged decompressions; though, a controversy exists regarding the surgical staging strategy and limited research is available on its operative management which are mostly retrospective. This randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare outcomes of simultaneous decompression, fusion and instrumentation of cervical and lumbar spine versus 2-stage operations. Methods: Twenty patients with TSS were randomly assigned to either of two groups; in the 1-stage group, simultaneous decompression, fusion and instrumentation of both cervical and lumbar spine were performed by two teams in a single operation. The 2- stage group underwent staged cervical and lumbar surgeries in 2 separate operations. Combined blood loss, transfused packed cells, operation time, recovery time, days of hospitalization, overall expenses, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and complications were compared between the two groups. Student T-test, Chi-square test and Pearson correlation were used for analyzing the data. Findings: Operation time, recovery time, days of hospitalization and overall expenses were significantly reduced in 1-stage surgery group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of combined blood loss, transfused packed cells or postoperative complications. Early cervical and lumbar clinical outcomes which were evaluated by Oswestry neck and back disability index, respectively, were similar in two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Single-stage surgery had comparable clinical outcomes compared to 2-stage operations without exposing the patients to unnecessary risks. © 2016. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences(IUMS). All rights reserved.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: 1-stage 2-stage Decompression Fusion and instrumentation surgery Tandem spinal stenosis Article bleeding cervical spondylotic myelopathy clinical trial decompression surgery erythrocyte concentrate human length of stay lumbar spinal stenosis operation duration Oswestry Disability Index prospective study randomized controlled trial spine fusion vertebral canal stenosis
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Isfahan Medical School
Journal Index: Scopus
Volume: 34
Number: 371
ISSN: 10277595 (ISSN)
Depositing User: مهندس مهدی شریفی
URI: http://eprints.mui.ac.ir/id/eprint/4159

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item